In the case of R v. A.D.H., what was the main factor that led to the accused being found not guilty?

In the case of R v. A.D.H., the main factor that led to the accused being found not guilty was the lack of intent to abandon the child. In criminal law, intent is a crucial element in determining culpability. If the prosecution cannot prove that the accused had the necessary intent to commit the crime, then the accused cannot be held criminally responsible. In this case, demonstrating that the accused did not have the intention to abandon the child was central to the defense's argument, leading to the determination of not guilty.

The absence of intent signifies that the actions of the accused did not fulfill the mental state required for the crime of abandonment. For criminal liability to attach, there must be a combination of actus reus (the physical act) and mens rea (the mental state). The court found that the accused's actions did not meet this threshold, establishing the foundation for the acquittal.